Magic Leap – Creations great but not small
The technology is there but the size is miles off
While Magic Leap is capable of producing an augmented reality (AR) experience that far outstrips anything its peers are offering, it is years away from fitting that technology into anything that a consumer will tolerate. The latest leak from Magic Leap shows a unit that is clearly a development board in a clear plastic box powered with an external battery pack and a fairly large head unit which is reported to be the latest prototype called PEQ, product equivalent. The company will be presenting the prototype to its board and investors this week, all of whom will be looking for results from the $1.39bn raised so far.
Magic Leap CEO, Rony Abovitz, has been quick to identify the device as a R&D test rig used for data collection that helps with the creation of surfaces and textures in AR. This follows a number of data points that Edison Research has collected over the last month. There appear to be problems with the core fibre optic technology that has led to the company having to redesign elements of its offering to make it smaller.
Suppliers have described conversations with Magic Leap engineers that strongly imply that some parts of the system are not even past the concept stage. Silicon Valley chatter also highlights the possibility of infighting between the Silicon Valley operations and the mothership in Florida as well as some high-level departures and very short senior tenures. The key to understanding what is happening at Magic Leap comes from Rony Abovitz himself who describes his prototypes as being in “agile build cycles”.
This means that the hardware and software design and specification of the PEQ product, that Magic Leap intends to launch, are far from being locked down. Consequently, there is no point whatsoever in spending a fortune trying to miniaturise the hardware as all that investment would be wasted if something has to be changed. We suspect Magic Leap has been forced by the pressure to start generating revenues into producing a compromised product.
Edison research indicates that the older, far bulkier prototype uses all of the Magic Leap technology and produces a great user experience but remains far too bulky to wear. Consequently, it appears that to make it wearable, Magic Leap has been forced to make compromises in the user experience. These would include features like field of view, resolution and refresh rate. This would explain why the feedback generated by the few who have experienced the technology appears to have gone from “wow!” to “ho-hum.”
Magic Leap is very far away from producing the kind of product with which it could take the AR market by storm. We do not think that this is a problem as almost all of its competitors are looking to sell their units to enterprises where the user experience is much less important.
Magic Leap is aiming for the consumer and given how poor the general AR experience is today, we cannot see anyone producing a successful consumer device for 2-3 years at least. This gives Magic Leap time in terms of the market it is aiming at but the real question is what time frame did it promise its investors and will they be willing to pour a lot more money into this company. One thing we are pretty sure of is that Magic Leap is going to need it.”
Disclaimer - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This document may contain materials from third parties, which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with Edison Investment Research. Edison Investment Research has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change without notice. While based on sources believed reliable, we do not represent this material as accurate or complete. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Edison Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence or objectivity of investment research.