Snap Inc. - Snap in the box
Facebook keeps Snap Inc. in its box.
Despite launching in August 2016, Instagram Stories has been extremely successful in mitigating the threat from Snap Inc. as it already has 50% more users than Snapchat. In a blog detailing some feature updates, Facebook has disclosed that Instagram Stories now has over 250m daily active users (DaU) all of whom have been added in the last 10 months. By comparison Snap Inc reported 166m DaU at its Q1 results in May and a far more pedestrian level of user growth. This is a strong indication that Facebook has been very successful in preventing its users from going outside its fledgling ecosystem of apps by replicating new services in house. It is also a sign of how critical the network effect is as Facebook’s 2bn users can all be directed to the Instagram app, use the same credentials and get going with a minimum amount of fuss.
By contrast, Snapchat is a completely different system to which users have to be separately recruited. It is this ease of transition and the fact that it is quite simple to cross promote Instagram Stories that has allowed Facebook to imitate an innovation and quickly dwarf the original creator. This is extremely concerning because we suspect that Facebook has more than 90% penetration of the smartphone users that matter from a marketing perspective. If this avenue in increasingly closed off to Snap Inc., then very real questions need to be asked about its medium-term growth prospects.
Snap’s narrow focus on Instant Messaging begs the comparison to Twitter, but this comparison does not go far enough. Twitter is stuck in a niche that it has fully monetised and its attempts to branch out into video are faltering. This means that its outlook for growth remains very bleak. However, in the Digital Life Pie segment of microblogging and related messaging, where Twitter is present it is dominant with no opposition. This means that once it stops spending money in trying to grow, it should make good, but static returns from monetising that niche.
Snap Inc on the other hand still has some growth ahead of it but Facebook is doing a very good job of keeping it out of its core user base. The company could conceivably generate revenues of $800m in 2017E and $1.2bn in 2018E as it is quite far from fully monetising the users and traffic that it already has. However, this is not enough to justify the current valuation.
Assuming that all goes well for the next 18 months, we can still be comfortable with a valuation of $14.4bn. While the current valuation is now closer to this figure than it was a few months ago, at $17 a share Snap Inc is still 13% above what would be considered to be fair value.
Consequently, we still see no reason to get involved especially as Facebook is showing every sign of very successfully keeping Snap in its box. Twitter, for all of its faults, still has better prospects.
Disclaimer - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This document may contain materials from third parties, which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with Edison Investment Research. Edison Investment Research has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change without notice. While based on sources believed reliable, we do not represent this material as accurate or complete. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Edison Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence or objectivity of investment research.