Troublesome hardware. Snap Inc. is admitting that it made a wrong turn with its spectacles
With the reorganisation of its hardware division, Snap Inc. is admitting that it made a wrong turn with its spectacles which despite being cool, no one bought. Steve Horowitz will now become president of technology and report to the chief strategy officer rather than the CEO in what can only be a significant demotion, while a large part of the marketing effort has also been terminated with the COO of hardware, Mark Randall presiding over the vestigial remains.
Despite being viewed as pretty much the coolest wearable device available, Snap Spectacles only managed to rack up around $5m in revenues during Q2 17. This clearly indicates that hardware was running at a substantial loss and with no turnaround in sight inevitably resulted in the cuts we have just witnessed. All references to becoming a camera company have now been quietly deleted leaving the company at a dead end when it comes to hardware. As Google and Facebook are finding, doing hardware when one is a software company is much more difficult than it sounds and we would not be surprised to see Snap quietly drop this idea completely.
This leaves Snap with little differentiation over Facebook which remains its biggest problem. Instagram has a habit of copying all of Snap’s best innovations and pushing them out to its much larger user base pretty quickly. This makes it extremely hard for Snap to compete as apps that offer communication are all about the network of users.
Metcalf’s Law of Networking states that the utility or value of a network increases by the square of the number of devices attached to it which would imply that Instagram should be at least 16x more valuable than Snap meaning that at Snap’s valuation, Instagram makes up more than half of the valuation of Facebook. Instagram is an important part of Facebook but I don’t think it is contributing more than 50% of Facebook’s value. Hence, I would be inclined to believe that Snap remains meaningfully over-valued.
Fair value for Snap remains around $12.40 per share which is still 10% below where the shares are today and negative sentiment could push the shares closer to $10 at which point acquirers could start to take interest. Until then we still see no reason to get involved and would strongly prefer Twitter to Snap Inc.
Disclaimer - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This document may contain materials from third parties, which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with Edison Investment Research. Edison Investment Research has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change without notice. While based on sources believed reliable, we do not represent this material as accurate or complete. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Edison Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence or objectivity of investment research.